Dynamic visual performance: Comparison between helmet‐mounted CRTs and LCDs
Identifieur interne : 001A47 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001A46; suivant : 001A48Dynamic visual performance: Comparison between helmet‐mounted CRTs and LCDs
Auteurs : Jeff Rabin [États-Unis] ; Roger Wiley [États-Unis]Source :
- Journal of the Society for Information Display [ 1071-0922 ] ; 1995-12.
Abstract
Abstract— A methodology is demonstrated for evaluating dynamic visual performance by comparing a helmet‐mounted cathode‐ray‐tube (CRT) display with a liquid‐crystal display (LCD). The miniature CRT contained in the Integrated Helmet and Display Sighting System (IHADSS) used in the AH‐64 Apache helicopter was compared to a head‐mounted active‐matrix LCD (AMLCD) currently under development. Dynamic visual performance was assessed by measuring flicker detection, target recognition vs. duration, and target recognition vs. velocity in five subjects tested with each display (two‐way repeated measures design). At low‐to‐moderate rates of stimulus presentation, there was no significant difference in dynamic visual performance between displays. However, at higher rates of presentation (flicker frequency greater than 4 Hz, target velocity greater than 4 deg/s, target duration less than 250 ms), dynamic visual performance was significantly reduced when using an LCD compared to a CRT (p < 0.01). These visual‐performance differences, which were not explicable by display differences in luminance, color, or spatial resolution, reflect differences in the capacity of each system to generate imagery of sufficient contrast at high rates of presentation. Implications for selection and development of visual displays for use in aviation and related fields are considered.
Url:
DOI: 10.1889/1.1984947
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000126
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000094
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000454
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001A63
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001A47
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dynamic visual performance: Comparison between helmet‐mounted CRTs and LCDs</title><author><name sortKey="Rabin, Jeff" sort="Rabin, Jeff" uniqKey="Rabin J" first="Jeff" last="Rabin">Jeff Rabin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wiley, Roger" sort="Wiley, Roger" uniqKey="Wiley R" first="Roger" last="Wiley">Roger Wiley</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3788051E47C8080E296D70E3D781D7C657264F17</idno><date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date><idno type="doi">10.1889/1.1984947</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-3J09XSWQ-X/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000126</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000126</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000094</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000454</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000454</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1071-0922:1995:Rabin J:dynamic:visual:performance</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001A63</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001A47</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001A47</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Dynamic visual performance: Comparison between helmet‐mounted CRTs and LCDs</title><author><name sortKey="Rabin, Jeff" sort="Rabin, Jeff" uniqKey="Rabin J" first="Jeff" last="Rabin">Jeff Rabin</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Alabama</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Visual Sciences Branch, Aircrew Health and Performance Division, U. S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, P. O. Box 620577, Fort Rucker</wicri:cityArea></affiliation><affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wiley, Roger" sort="Wiley, Roger" uniqKey="Wiley R" first="Roger" last="Wiley">Roger Wiley</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><placeName><region type="state">Alabama</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Visual Sciences Branch, Aircrew Health and Performance Division, U. S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, P. O. Box 620577, Fort Rucker</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of the Society for Information Display</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION DISPLAY</title><idno type="ISSN">1071-0922</idno><idno type="eISSN">1938-3657</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="97">97</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="100">100</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">4</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1995-12">1995-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1071-0922</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1071-0922</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract— A methodology is demonstrated for evaluating dynamic visual performance by comparing a helmet‐mounted cathode‐ray‐tube (CRT) display with a liquid‐crystal display (LCD). The miniature CRT contained in the Integrated Helmet and Display Sighting System (IHADSS) used in the AH‐64 Apache helicopter was compared to a head‐mounted active‐matrix LCD (AMLCD) currently under development. Dynamic visual performance was assessed by measuring flicker detection, target recognition vs. duration, and target recognition vs. velocity in five subjects tested with each display (two‐way repeated measures design). At low‐to‐moderate rates of stimulus presentation, there was no significant difference in dynamic visual performance between displays. However, at higher rates of presentation (flicker frequency greater than 4 Hz, target velocity greater than 4 deg/s, target duration less than 250 ms), dynamic visual performance was significantly reduced when using an LCD compared to a CRT (p < 0.01). These visual‐performance differences, which were not explicable by display differences in luminance, color, or spatial resolution, reflect differences in the capacity of each system to generate imagery of sufficient contrast at high rates of presentation. Implications for selection and development of visual displays for use in aviation and related fields are considered.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Alabama</li></region></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Alabama"><name sortKey="Rabin, Jeff" sort="Rabin, Jeff" uniqKey="Rabin J" first="Jeff" last="Rabin">Jeff Rabin</name></region><name sortKey="Wiley, Roger" sort="Wiley, Roger" uniqKey="Wiley R" first="Roger" last="Wiley">Roger Wiley</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/CovidV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A47 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001A47 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= CovidV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3788051E47C8080E296D70E3D781D7C657264F17
|texte= Dynamic visual performance: Comparison between helmet‐mounted CRTs and LCDs
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |